For the curious, I consider myself the following:
6 Comments
Comments are closed.
Archive by Date
- November 2021
- March 2020
- October 2019
- July 2019
- January 2019
- May 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- May 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
- November 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001
- May 2001
- April 2001
- March 2001
- February 2001
- November 2000
- August 2000
- January 2000
© 2024 Technoccult
Theme by Anders Norén — Up ↑
April 13, 2009 at 5:43 pm
Ooo ooo… can I play too?
* Atheist
* Existentialist
* Philosophical pessimist
* Left Wing Social Darwinist
April 13, 2009 at 5:45 pm
Everyone can play.
April 14, 2009 at 2:31 am
left wing social darwinist? how does that work? or am i missing the sarcasm? :p
April 14, 2009 at 10:15 am
Oo, memetastic!
Ulysses: What the hell is a darwinist? Yes, evolution is obviously how things work, but darwin didn’t even know about DNA. Perhaps Evolutionist would be a better term to use? I certainly trust in the theory of gravity, but that doesn’t make me a Newtonist.
Or does it?
April 15, 2009 at 3:56 am
Group selectionist. Better, kids? Nietzschean collectivist also works, I suppose. It’s the inverse of anarcho-monarchism. Or the converse. Or something.
Also, supporter of sapir-whorf. HERETIC.
April 16, 2009 at 11:02 pm
I could probably also sum up my political views by just citing Wikipedia’s summary of Paul Krugman’s political views:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krugman#Political_views